The Blockchain Industry Has Split at the DNA Level into "On-Chain Finance" and "Crypto"

ConfidenceLikely
Updated2026-05-18
Review by2026-08-07
Sources3
Machine-translatedOriginal (JA)
#fintech#blockchain#stablecoin
On this page

Wiki route

This entry sits under fintech index. Read it with Japan financial regulation — legal framework for tokens, crypto-assets, and payments for adjacent context and Japan stablecoin legal framework: three-layer structure (JPYC, USDC, Project Pax) for the broader system boundary.

[!info] TL;DR Since 2024, blockchain technology has fully split into “crypto” (ideology-driven, permissionless, decentralized) and “on-chain finance” (purely technology-driven, focused on payment efficiency). Even though both use the word “blockchain,” they can refer to fundamentally different institutional and technical categories depending on context. Discussing them in the same frame weakens analytical coherence.

Conclusion

Crypto and on-chain finance have different “DNA.” The two are no longer compatible.

Perspective Crypto On-chain finance
Driving principle Ideology (permissionless, decentralization, finality) Pure technology (payment-efficiency improvement)
Lead companies Tether (USDT), Circle (USDC on the crypto side) Digital Asset (Canton Network), Circle (Arc Network line integration)
Partners Crypto-asset exchanges DTCC, Nasdaq, Broadridge, the three megabanks, trust-bank group
KYC Assumes permissionless access Institutional-grade KYC required
Culture Anti-incumbent finance Anti-crypto (the Canton line launched as explicitly anti-crypto)

Reasoning

  • A single undifferentiated “blockchain” discussion belongs to the pre-2023 era. By 2024-2025 , the tech stack, corporate actors, and value systems had completely diverged.
  • Crypto’s idea that “everyone can touch the chain” is structurally incompatible with institutional-investor settlement (→ institutional-stablecoin-deposit-token-thesis).
  • The company behind Canton Network, Digital Asset, was founded on the explicit view that “crypto is being used the wrong way.”

Applicable When

  • Before starting a blockchain-related strategy discussion, when you need to confirm which trajectory the other side is talking about
  • When someone proposes bringing USDT/USDC into an institutional-investor use case (see Wall Street and crypto-neutral arms-dealer model)
  • When decomposing the target market of a new SC project
  • Before using the word “blockchain” in a stakeholder presentation

Source

Discovery

Keep reading

Related

Read next

Links here