International comparison of crypto-asset exchange bankruptcy proceedings

ConfidenceLikely
Updated2026-05-19
Review by2026-08-07
Sources1
Machine-translatedOriginal (JA)
#exchanges#bankruptcy#insolvency#global#comparison
On this page

Wiki route

This entry sits under exchanges index. Read it against Global CEX top 10 ranking comparison (2025-2026) for peer / contrast context and FSA crypto-asset exchange registration system — number system / Local Finance Bureau jurisdiction / registration requirements for the broader system / regulatory boundary.

Overview

This contrasts 6 件+ major crypto-asset exchange / lending-operator bankruptcy cases that occurred in 2014-2026 年 within the frameworks of US Chapter 11 +, Japan’s civil rehabilitation / bankruptcy, and each country’s system. The presence or absence of customer-asset segregation is the single largest factor determining repayment speed, and it is the area where the philosophical differences in institutional design are most strikingly expressed.

Comparison table of the 6 major bankruptcy cases

Case Jurisdiction Filing Procedure Repayment speed Repayment rate
Mt.Gox Japan 2014-02 Civil rehabilitation → bankruptcy → civil rehabilitation restart 12 years (started 2024-06 ) Partial recovery of customer assets + price-surge gains
FTX International US 2022-11 Chapter 11 3 years (completed 2025-06 100%) Internal commingling → legal restructuring
FTX Japan Japan 2022-11 (parent bankrupt but itself sound) Segregation function 3 months (immediate 100% return 2023-02 , world’s first) 100%
Celsius Network US 2022-07 Chapter 11 2 years (2024-01) 60-79% (DeFi lending failure)
Voyager Digital US 2022-07 Chapter 11 2 years (2024-05) 35-50% (institutional lending exposure)
BlockFi US 2022-11 Chapter 11 1 years (2023 partial repayment) Partial repayment after customer-asset freeze

Institutional factors (repayment-speed differences)

  • Customer-asset segregation: mandatory in Japan (trust) > no strict interpretation in the US → Japan achieves early repayment
  • Customer-asset commingling: FTX International (Alameda commingling) / Celsius (DeFi-management commingling) → repayment delay
  • Presence of outflow: Mt.Gox (massive outflow) = 12 years vs FTX Japan (no outflow) = 3 months

Repayment forms

  • JPY immediate: FTX Japan (world’s first)
  • BTC physical + JPY choice: Mt.Gox (civil rehabilitation plan)
  • New-company shares + cash hybrid: Celsius / FTX International
  • Fiat only: BlockFi

Regulatory reflection

Japan orients toward prevention with FSA business-improvement orders + JVCEA self-regulation. The US, by contrast, has a structure that relies on after-the-fact response via Chapter 11 + SEC enforcement. MiCA (EU) introduced a phased CASP bankruptcy-resolution protocol, building a preventive framework across the entire EU bloc. The philosophical difference in institutional design produces entirely different outcomes from the same bankruptcy event.


Source: US PACER public bankruptcy records, FSA announcements, FTX/Celsius/Voyager official IR, Nikkei/Coindesk reporting

Discovery

Keep reading

Related

Read next

Links here