SBI × JPYC × Circle ring shareholding — Japan stablecoin distribution channel
ConfidenceCertainUpdated2026-08-14Review by2026-11-12Sources4Machine-translatedOriginal (JA)
Wiki route
This entry sits under fintech index. Read it with Japan Financial Regulation — Legal Framework for Tokens, Crypto Assets, and Payments for adjacent context and Three-Layer Structure of Japan's Stablecoin Regulatory Regime (JPYC, USDC, Project Pax) for the broader system boundary.
[!info] TL;DR The ring shareholding structure formed by SBI × Circle × JPYC is the single most important distribution channel in 2025-2026 年 Japanese stablecoins —— SBI Circle Holdings (2025-08 equal investment 50/50) holds the exclusive domestic issuance channel for USDC, Circle holds JPYC 3.51%, and JPYC, as a Circle Partner SC, locks the three parties together to form the cross-border-compliance hegemon architecture after §501(d) listing. In the Japan 4 -camp evaluation, this channel is rated #1 ★★★★★ in the v2 evaluation, far surpassing the Progmat trust-type consortium (which has no cross-border channel).
Key facts
- 2025-08: SBI Holdings + Circle Internet Financial established SBI Circle Holdings through equal investment (50/50 JV)
- Ring shareholding: Circle holds approx. 3.51% of JPYC; JPYC ∈ Circle Partner SC; SBI is indirectly related to JPYC via SBI Circle Holdings
- Domestic channel: Jp Exchange SBI Vc Trade = a domestic 第 1 号 EPI operator (authorized 2025-03-04) · began domestic handling of USDC (2025-03-26)
- Capital investment: SBI HD + SBI Shinsei invested a total of $50M in the Circle IPO (2025-06-05 NYSE listing)
- Progmat non-participation: Yoshitaka Kitao posted on X 2026-02 “uniform / competition-restricting / convoy-fleet-style” —— stating explicitly that it will not join the Progmat trust-type consortium
- Complemented by JPYSC: SBI Shinsei Trust Bank × Startale’s “JPYSC” trust-type SC (launching 2026-Q2 ) complements the “yen side”
- APLUS connection: 2026 spring, a proof-of-concept of in-store USDC payment
Mechanism / How it works
Circle Internet Financial(USDC issuer)
│ 50%
│ 3.51%
├─────────────> JPYC Inc.(funds-transfer business EPI)
│ │ Circle Partner SC
▼ │
SBI Circle Holdings ◀──────────┤ ring cross-reference
│ 50% │
SBI Holdings ────────────┘
│
├── SBI VC Trade(EPI #1)→ USDC domestic
├── APLUS → in-store payment
├── SBI Shinsei Trust × Startale → JPYSC(2026-Q2)
└── Arc global payment network Japan independent channel
Channel functions:
- USDC entry point: SBI VC Trade’s exclusive domestic EPI channel
- JPY side: the dual yen-stablecoin options of JPYC (funds-transfer business) + JPYSC (trust type)
- Cross-border compliance: the bidirectional USDC ↔ JPYC compliance channel after §501(d) listing
- Retail touchpoint: APLUS credit cards + in-store scenes
Origin & evolution
2023-11-27 SBI HD + Circle basic agreement on business alliance
2025-03-04 SBI VC Trade = a domestic 第 1 号 EPI operator
2025-03-25 SBI HD + Circle joint-venture establishment contract
2025-03-26 SBI VC Trade = began domestic handling of USDC
2025-06-05 Circle NYSE listing · SBI invested a total of $50M
2025-08 SBI Circle Holdings established(50/50)
2025-12-16 SBI HD + Startale announced the "JPYSC" trust-type SC
2026-02 Yoshitaka Kitao on X: "refusal to join Progmat"
v1 → v2 evaluation jump: before the §501(d) promulgation, the SBI camp was seen as “independent line / #3.” After the promulgation, the value of the USDC ↔ JPY cross-border-compliance channel surged, and SBI Circle Holdings was promoted to #1 ★★★★★ —— Progmat (the 3 megabank trust type) was demoted to #3 on the grounds of “no cross-border-compliance channel”; for details see Multi-Megabank Consortium Governance.
Related
- Wiki Index
- Three-Layer Structure of Japan's Stablecoin Regulatory Regime (JPYC, USDC, Project Pax)
- Framework for Fragmented Stablecoin Regimes
- Stablecoin interest distribution economics
- Comparison of US, EU, and Japanese stablecoin regimes — No confirmed MRA; market access reviewed separately
- Japan Financial Regulation — Legal Framework for Tokens, Crypto Assets, and Payments
Sources
Discovery
Keep reading
Read next
- Explosive Growth in B2B Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments (733% YoY, $226B)Key data points (as of 2026年4月):
- Stablecoin issuers 2025-2026 — evidence-led market mapStablecoin market structure must be measured from a dated supply dataset and then explained with issuer-level primary sources. The earlier version of this page mixed an undated market-cap ra...
- Stablecoin regulatory comparison · a reading map of public primary sources (2026-05 starting point)The following table is a reading order maintained by this entry, not a classification by an external institution.
Links here
- Japan stablecoin / BaaS bank perimeter (2025–2026)Japan's public-source perimeter distinguishes bank deposit tokens from electronic payment instruments (電子決済手段) under the Payment Services Act. The FSA explains that a category-1 EPI issuer m...
- Japan stablecoin issuer regulatory classification matrix — Electronic Payment Instruments business / trust type / bank-issued type / funds-transfer-operator type / prepaid-payment-instrument boundaryJapan's yen- and USD-denominated stablecoins should be checked by issuer, legal entity, and provided function across the boundaries among the funds-transfer-operator type, trust type, tokeni...
- Japan VASP business-model competitive matrix — comparison of 39 社's business segments / revenue structures / differentiation axesThe FSA crypto-asset exchange service provider registry lists 26 operators as of 2026-06-30. The matrix's 39 analytical rows also include crypto-asset derivatives, electronic-payment-instrum...
- JPYC Inc. — Japanese-yen stablecoin issuer (funds-transfer-operator type)The table is limited to establishment, token classification, registration, launch, and funding milestones confirmed in JPYC's official announcements. Issuance figures elsewhere in this entry...
- SBI VC Trade Co., Ltd. (SBI VCトレード株式会社) — Japan crypto-asset exchange operator overviewThe company's official profile lists three registrations: crypto-asset exchange business, Type I financial instruments business, and electronic-payment-instruments business. A comparative “o...