Japan's three EPI issuance routes · overview of trust, bank and funds-transfer-provider models
ConfidenceCertainUpdated2026-07-30Review by2026-09-22Sources3Machine-translatedOriginal (JA)
Wiki route
This entry sits under fintech index. Read it with Japan’s financial regulation — legal framework for tokens, crypto-assets and payments for adjacent context and Japan’s three-tier stablecoin legal framework (JPYC, USDC and Project Pax) for the broader system boundary.
[!info] TL;DR Effective from 2023-06 the amended Payment Services Act established a framework for fiat-linked electronic payment instruments and for electronic payment instrument service providers that intermediate them. Banks, funds-transfer providers, trust companies and similar entities are contemplated as issuance routes, but limits, redemption and user protection differ by governing law, registration category and product design. A project announcement alone does not prove that a product has been issued or an entity registered.
Key facts
- Enactment in 2022-06 and commencement in 2023-06 established the framework for electronic payment instruments.
- An electronic payment instrument’s issuance route is distinct from registration for purchase, exchange and management by an electronic payment instrument service provider.
- Funds-transfer providers have Type I, Type II and Type III categories; amount limits cannot be summarized for every product as a uniform “100 万円 / 件” (one million yen per transaction).
- Specific examples of trust, bank and funds-transfer-provider models should be confirmed through the FSA registration lists, issuer disclosures, and the application of trust, banking and funds-transfer laws.
Mechanism / How it works
Comparison of EPI issuance routes:
The table below organizes the framework based on the FSA materials on electronic payment instruments and the Payment Services Act. For the issuance and registration status of a specific product, prioritize the latest FSA list and issuer disclosures.
| Issuance route | Issuing entity | Main legal framework | Amount / distribution conditions | Treatment of examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trust model | Trust company, trust bank or similar entity | Trust Business Act / Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution, and electronic payment instruments under the Payment Services Act | Follows the trust property, redemption terms and beneficial-interest design. Do not make a blanket claim of “no limit” | For Progmat and similar cases, distinguish the concept / platform from actual issuance projects |
| Bank model | Bank | Banking Act and electronic payment instruments under the Payment Services Act | Follows the bank liability, product terms and supervisory requirements | Do not equate a published experiment or plan with commercial issuance |
| Funds-transfer-provider model | Registered funds-transfer provider | Payment Services Act (Type I, Type II and Type III) | Differs by category, retention rules, performance security and product terms | For JPYC and similar cases, check the latest registration and product disclosures |
These three categories are legal issuance routes based on the issuing entity. They do not automatically determine a particular chain, customer group, circulation amount or governance ratio. Verify Progmat, bank experiments and JPYC against the latest issuance, registration and product materials for each.
Origin & evolution
The amendment concerning electronic payment instruments was enacted in 2022-06 and took effect in 2023-06 together with the related government orders and supervisory guidelines. See the FSA notice for the history of the framework and current materials. For each project, distinguish a concept announcement, the issuer’s eligibility under its governing law, registration of an intermediary, and actual product issuance; track these through the latest FSA lists and company disclosures.
Related
- Wiki Index
- Japan’s four stablecoin camps
- Japan stablecoin regulatory landscape
- Japan’s trust-type stablecoin architecture
- GENIUS Act implementation status
Sources
- Financial Services Agency — Framework information for electronic payment instruments and crypto-assets: https://www.fsa.go.jp/policy/virtual_currency02/index.html
- Financial Services Agency — Government ordinances and supervisory guidelines accompanying enforcement of the amended Payment Services Act: https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/r4/sonota/20230526/20230526.html
- e-Gov Law Search — Payment Services Act (平成21年法律第59号): https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/document?lawid=421AC0000000059
Discovery
Keep reading
Read next
- Japan Listed Company Disclosure Monitoring SOP (17 Channels)TDnet is updated as disclosure events occur; there is no company-wide fixed “15:00 announcement” time. The Tokyo Stock Exchange cash market has closed at 15:30 since 2024-11-05, so monitorin...
- Japan Stablecoin 2026 · Verified Event TrackerThe principal verified events are JPYC's funds-transfer registration on 2025-08-18 and launch on 2025-10-27; SBI VC Trade's registration as an electronic payment instruments service provider...
Links here
- Japan stablecoin / BaaS bank perimeter (2025–2026)Japan's public-source perimeter distinguishes bank deposit tokens from electronic payment instruments (電子決済手段) under the Payment Services Act. The FSA explains that a category-1 EPI issuer m...
- Japan stablecoin issuer regulatory classification matrix — Electronic Payment Instruments business / trust type / bank-issued type / funds-transfer-operator type / prepaid-payment-instrument boundaryJapan's yen- and USD-denominated stablecoins should be checked by issuer, legal entity, and provided function across the boundaries among the funds-transfer-operator type, trust type, tokeni...
- Domestic CEX × deposit tokens / EPI integration strategy — DCJPY / Progmat / JPYC collaborationThe 2022-06 amended Payment Services Act brought into force the system of the three EPI (electronic payment instrument) types — trust type / bank type / funds-transfer-operator type — establ...
- Domestic Crypto-Asset VASP Regulatory Timeline (2014–2026)Japan's crypto-asset regulation has been built up incrementally, triggered by both major domestic incidents (Mt.Gox, Coincheck) and international coordination pressure (FATF Travel Rule, MiC...
- Asia Tokenisation Infrastructure: Three Poles2017-2020 MAS / HKMA / BoJ each launched early tokenisation / CBDC projects (MAS Ubin / HKMA-PBoC CBDC / BoJ Digital Yen research). 2021 mBridge launched → HKMA claimed the cross-border posi...